Volume 80, Issue 6 p. 1739-1755

Social Information Processing, Moral Reasoning, and Emotion Attributions: Relations With Adolescents’ Reactive and Proactive Aggression

William F. Arsenio

William F. Arsenio

Yeshiva University

Search for more papers by this author
Erin Adams

Erin Adams

Hall-Brooke Behavioral Health Services

Search for more papers by this author
Jason Gold

Jason Gold

University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 12 November 2009
Citations: 170
concerning this article should be sent to William F. Arsenio, Ferkauf Graduate School of Psychology, Yeshiva University, Rousso Building, 1300 Morris Park Avenue, Bronx, NY 10461. Electronic mail may be sent to [email protected].

Abstract

Connections between adolescents’ social information processing (SIP), moral reasoning, and emotion attributions and their reactive and proactive aggressive tendencies were assessed. One hundred mostly African American and Latino 13- to 18-year-olds from a low-socioeconomic-status (SES) urban community and their high school teachers participated. Reactive aggression was uniquely related to expected ease in enacting aggression, lower verbal abilities, and hostile attributional biases, and most of these connections were mediated by adolescents’ attention problems. In contrast, proactive aggression was uniquely related to higher verbal abilities and expectations of more positive emotional and material outcomes resulting from aggression. Discussion focused on the utility of assessing both moral and SIP-related cognitions, and on the potential influence of low-SES, high-risk environments on these findings.