Volume 93, Issue 6 p. 1631-1648
REVIEW

A meta-analysis on observed paternal and maternal sensitivity

Audrey-Ann Deneault

Corresponding Author

Audrey-Ann Deneault

Department of Psychology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada

Correspondence

Audrey-Ann Deneault, Department of Psychology University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta T2N 1N4, Canada.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
Natasha J. Cabrera

Natasha J. Cabrera

Department of Human Development and Quantitative Methodology, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Jean-François Bureau

Jean-François Bureau

School of Psychology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 29 July 2022
Citations: 5

Abstract

Two meta-analyses were conducted (N = 10,980 child–father dyads) with 93 studies published between 1983–2020, primarily in North America and Europe, on observed parental sensitivity to children (3–180 months; 48% girls; 14% non-White) in partnered mothers and fathers. The first meta-analysis found higher maternal mean levels of observed sensitivity, with a small effect size (d = −.27). Differences between parents were larger with micro coding and triadic/family assessments. Differences narrowed as a function of publication year and were not significant in European samples. The second meta-analysis identified a moderate correlation between observed maternal and paternal sensitivity (r = .23 after adjusting for probable publication bias). Correlations were larger in Middle Eastern samples and with composite sensitivity scales.