Volume 11, Issue 3 pp. 196-201
Article

Dealing With Social Difficulty During Adolescence: The Role of Implicit Theories of Personality

David S. Yeager

Corresponding Author

David S. Yeager

University of Texas at Austin

Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to David S. Yeager, University of Texas at Austin, 108 E. Dean Keeton Stop A8000, Austin, TX 78712-1043; e-mail: [email protected].Search for more papers by this author
First published: 11 April 2017
Citations: 19
David S. Yeager, University of Texas at Austin Department of Psychology.
Work on this article was supported by the Thrive Foundation for Youth, the Spencer Foundation, the Raikes Foundation, the William T. Grant Foundation, the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (award number R01HD084772), and a fellowship from the Center for Advanced Study in the Behavioral Sciences. The content does not necessarily represent the official view of the National Institutes of Health. I am grateful to Carol Dweck for her feedback on an earlier draft of the article, and to James Gross for suggesting the connections with the emotion-regulation process model. I also appreciate the contributions of all the students and teachers who participated in this research.

Abstract

Social difficulty during adolescence contributes to internalizing problems (e.g., depression, stress) and spurs cycles of aggression and retaliation. In this article, I review how implicit theories of personality—beliefs about whether people can change their socially relevant characteristics—cause some adolescents to respond to social difficulty in these ways while others do not. Believing an entity theory of personality—the belief that people cannot change—causes people to blame their own and others’ traits for social difficulty, and predicts more extreme affective, physiological, and behavioral responses (e.g., depression, aggression). Interventions that teach an incremental theory of personality—the belief that people can change—can reduce problematic reactions to social difficulty. I discuss why interventions to alter implicit theories improve adolescents’ responses to conflict, and I propose suggestions for research.